U.N Debate

The U.N. style debate was very informative for all the students that were involved in it and i dont think any of the countries/groups have been dissapointed by the task that they were set or the country that they were assigned. So a pat on the back for the lecturer's on that front. I learned more about most countries that i didnt know before esspecially that Denmark was a huge powerhouse in the form of sustainable development. As for my country i realised what a creul old world it is out there with the aid that countries give poorer countries such as malawi is not "free" aid however it has to be paid ack at a extortionate rate of interest meaning that they need another loan from another country to pay off the interest that they have borrowed from a bigger nation in terms of aid. I also learnt that the U.S.A have one of the worst sustainable development policy and the fact that they want to spen more on the military when there is 60 million people every year that go without health care because of the non socialised medicine that the USA of implamented.

The sustianable development development stragies in my country was very easy to find becasue it was mostly on the UN and CIA websites however i know that some people did not find this as easy as i did and some of the webpages on the CIA website were in the language that the country spoke meaning that it rendered these websites useless. I feel there was a huge variety in the decisions of all nations and what they decided to spend the money on. The decisions came with economic wealth due to the fact that economically well ff countries dont need the sustainable devolpment policies that poorer countries need